House Bill 5 Community and Student Engagement (CaSE)
Under House Bill 5 (passed last year by the 83rd Texas Legislature), all districts are required to evaluate the district's performance and the performance of each campus in regard to community and student engagement. Districts must assign one of four performance ratings - Exemplary, Recognized, Acceptable or Unacceptable - to the district and each campus for overall performance, including the following categories:
OVERALL RATING | |
Fine Arts | |
Wellness and Physical Education | |
Community and Parental Involvement | |
21st Century Workforce Development Program | |
Second Language Acquisition Program | |
Digital Learning Environment | |
Dropout Prevention Strategies | |
Educational Programs for Gifted & Talented Students | |
Statutory Compliance |
Primary School | Wellness & Physical Education Community & Parental Involvement Dropout Prevention |
Intermediate School | Wellness & Physical Education Community & Parental Involvement Ed. Programs for Gifted & Talented Students |
Middle School | Fine Arts Community & Parental Involvement Dropout Prevention |
High School | Fine Arts Community & Parental Involvement Workforce Development |
ACC | Workforce Development Community & Parent Involvement Dropout Prevention |
District | Fine Arts Community & Parental Involvement Dropout Prevention |
A | B | C | D | F |
The purpose of the program is being met in its entirety. All indicators of quality program are evidenced. Numerous, high quality activities and strategies are offered. Exceptional level of student and community engagement. |
There are many indications that the purpose of the program is being met. Multiple indicators of a quality program. Numerous activities and strategies are offered. High level of student and community engagement. |
Some evidence that they purpose of the program is being met. Some evidence of a quality program. Adequate activities and strategies are offered. Moderate level of student and community engagement. |
Little evidence that the purpose of the program is being met. Little evidence of a quality program exists. Limited activities and strategies are offered. Little student and community engagement. |
No evidence that the purpose of the program is being met. No evidence of a quality program exists. No activities or strategies are offered. No student and community engagement. |
Resources
· TEA Reporting Requirements